Durability > Durability theory > Biaxial fatigue evaluation on element free faces
Von Mises effective amplitude approach
With the Von Mises effective amplitude approach, the durability solver selects one of the two effective principal axes as the primary loading direction, and designates the other as the secondary loading direction.
It processes the stress or strain data in the primary loading direction, and uses the stress biaxial ratio to include the effect from the secondary loading direction. Therefore, the durability solver only performs one rainflow cycle counting for the stress or strain history in the primary loading direction. NOTE
When the stress or strain amplitude and mean stress of each cycle is obtained, the durability solver then uses the stress biaxial ratio to update the stress-based and strain-based life equations, and the Smith-Watson-Topper equation.
Updating stress-based life equations
For the stress life and user-defined S-N curve, the fatigue life equations are updated using the effective stress amplitude of the biaxial cycle instead of the stress amplitude and the effective mean stress of the biaxial cycle instead of the mean stress in the life equation.
where
is the effective stress amplitude in the primary loading direction of the biaxial cycle.
is the stress amplitude in the primary loading direction without accounting for the biaxial effect.
is the effective mean stress of the biaxial cycle.
σm is the mean stress without accounting for the biaxial effect.
r is the stress biaxial ratio.
Updating strain life (maximum principal) equations
By including the stress effect from the secondary loading direction, the life equation can be derived as:
where:
is the maximum principal strain amplitude.
2Nf is the number of reversals to failure.
E is the modulus of elasticity.
σ'f is the fatigue strength coefficient material property.
b is the fatigue strength exponent material property.
ε'f is the fatigue ductility coefficient material property.
c is the fatigue ductility exponent material property.
νe is the Poisson's ratio.
Updating Smith-Watson-Topper equations
By including the stress effect from the secondary loading direction, the life equation can be derived as:
For more information see:
Principal axes approach
Maximum damage approach
Stress biaxial ratio
Learn more
Static events
Transient events
Look up more details
Biaxial fatigue evaluation on element free faces
Brown-Miller approach
Stress biaxial ratio
Strain biaxial ratio
Biaxial fatigue evaluation for beam elements
Quick links
Command reference
Pre/Post video examples
Bulk Entry Descriptions
Simcenter 3D tutorials
Browse Simcenter 3D help by product area
Von Mises effective amplitude approach, Simcenter 3D 2021.1 Series
© 2020 Siemens
Matsuishi, M., and Endo, T., “Fatigue of Metals Subjected to Varying Stress”, Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, March, 1968.
Endo, T., et. al., “Damage Evaluation of Metals for Random or Varying Loading”, Proceedings of the 1974 Symposium on Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Volume 1, Society of Materials Science, Japan, 1974. pp. 371-380.
Tipton, S.M., and Fash, J.W., “Multiaxial Fatigue Life Predictions for the SAE Specimen Using Strain-based Approach”, in Multiaxial Fatigue: Analysis & Experiments, SAE AE-14, 1989, pp. 67-80.
window.mainLanguage="en_US"
window.delivId=""
window.projectId=""
MathJax.Hub.Config({ TeX: { extensions: ["autoload-all.js"] }, tex2jax: { displayMath: [ ] }, "SVG": { scale: 125 } });
Source: https://docs.sw.siemens.com/en-US/doc/289054037/PL20200601120302950.advanced/id986784 · retrieved 2026-07-17